One times ten?
By
Kurt on March 8, 2006 in Reviews and news.
In early March 2006, someone at maxxuss.com posted a way to patch Skype so that 10-way voice conference calling is enabled, regardless of the speed or type of processor installed on the platform. (It's a rather clever idea; the author should consult jobs.skype.com. But I digress.)
The description I've read of the patch would not compromise Skype or alter the program's functionality. Instead, it would simply report to the Skype application inaccurate information about the type of computer processor on which the program is running. Of course, we have no idea whether the patches that are circulating around make other changes that are as yet undocumented.
We would like to point out that patching the Skype binary (or any software, for that matter) with unknown code is generally considered to be a very dangerous practice. We digitally sign our software (on Windows, this is done with Authenticode signatures) and we strongly encourage users to both verify the digital signature of our software and to not tamper with the program's integrity.





Comments
Spin. You got caught out by maxxuss.com fair and square. The only reason you can't do 10-way on an AMD chip is because you've signed some deal.
I won't be using skype again.
AMD forever!
(let's see you post this skype or won't intel let you)
memudda | Wednesday, Mar 8
I must say this Intel-only protected feature is really a strange move for a company such as yours. Its stupid because it locks users (and thus revenue) out, people will get irritated about it. This the reason we decided not to go with skype for the Office, not because it affects us - we are mostly on intel - but because of principles.
I'd guess there is someone in the market/partners department that came up with the idea, and thats one thing. But that it actually got approved, thats frightening.
alexandersandstrom | Tuesday, Jul 18
I see you say: We digitally sign our software (on Windows, this is done with Authenticode signatures)
but your upgrade posted now, is not digitally signed so I do not want to upgrade using it. Was the 2.5 inadvertently not signed?
thanks
Mandhi
mandhiusa | Thursday, Nov 2
Although I own an Intel CPU, I, too, frown upon this kind of behaviour. I sure hope that it will not happen again.
You cannot forget the fact that Internet is a huge community of users. Should an application make fun of some of its users owing a certain equipment, they will all change to something else. You may be the largest company with VoIP service but this is not something solid.
nickgreek242 | Wednesday, Dec 13
What a bunch of windbags. Free voip free video conferencing woohoo thanks skype. Need more functionality then buy it you cheap skates.
colinmclauchlan | Tuesday, Apr 10